Kevin Eby Blog on Bill 23

February 8, 2024

The Opinion piece below was prepared by Kevin Eby for the Ontario Professional Planners Institute back in December 2022.

Note: Minor changes were subsequently made to Bill 23 negating the issue raised in the last bullet in the Opinion piece.  

What is Bill 23 Really About? 

By Kevin Eby

It is completely unrealistic to assume the affordable housing crisis we face today will be solved by the  private sector. That is not the business they are in. Ultimately, the affordable housing crisis will only be  resolved through partnerships between the Federal government, the Province, municipalities, non profits, co-operatives, charitable organizations and other agencies. The private sector will play a  supporting role in this process, but simply providing them with more urban designated land in the vain  hope that somehow this will result in more and cheaper homes being built is not a realistic solution. 

The Province's Housing Affordability Task Force stated: "a shortage of land isn't the cause of the  problem" yet many of the solutions, including the subsequent announcement that lands are proposed to  be removed from the Greenbelt, focus on increasing the supply of land. 

This is perplexing until one realizes that the major focus of Bill 23 is not actually about building more  homes to address the housing affordability issues facing Ontario today. If the Province was serious about  doing that it would instead be establishing collaborative processes with a broad range of partners to  address the issue. They aren't doing that. 

They didn't even consult with municipalities, stakeholders, or agencies before proposing massive  changes to municipal planning, financing, and governance in Ontario. When it comes to the issue of  whether more land is needed, they even ignored their own Housing Affordability Task Force. 

Why? Because housing affordability appears simply to be the cover being used to resolve long-standing  grudges the development and homebuilding industries have with municipalities, Conservation  Authorities, and the public. What appears very complex is actually pretty simple: 

• The Growth Plan promotes intensification over sprawl – the proposed changes will eliminate the  Growth Plan. 

• Regional official plans and regional planning have proven effective at ensuring only the amount  of land actually needed to accommodate forecasted growth is brought into urban areas – Bill 23  eliminates regional official plans and regional planning. 

• Development Charges were introduced to make sure growth pays for itself and not put the cost  of growth onto the shoulders of taxpayers – Bill 23 transfers some growth-related costs to  taxpayers. 

• Provincially significant wetlands (PSWs) increased costs to developers who had to make sure  these important ecological features were protected to help us avoid catastrophic floods and  maintain important wildlife habitat – the proposed changes to the evaluation criteria for PSWs  eliminate much of this problem for developers. 

• Public input and associated alterations to proposed developments often cut into developer  profits – Bill 23 eliminates public meetings for plans of subdivision and third-party appeals to the  Ontario Land Tribunal.

• Design requirements and green standards require developers to put more care into how they  build so as to create more liveable neighbourhoods and mitigate climate change – Bill 23 prohibits  implementation of these practices. 

These changes appear to have been proposed without any consultation with affected parties other than  the development and homebuilding industries. None of these changes appear to be about building more  homes. They are about profits. If the development and homebuilding industries had wanted to build  more homes here in the Region of Waterloo and elsewhere in Ontario, they could have. There were  plenty of approved lots in greenfield areas and pre-zoned intensification parcels available. Instead, they  ignored the part of the market that is not profitable enough for them and in some cases withheld lots  from the market to meet longer-term business plans. 

Kevin Eby, RPP, PLE 

Waterloo, Ontario